PLoP 96 FINAL SUBMISSION EVALUATION FORM


   Reviewer: ____________________________________________________________


============== (authors will see all but the reviewer's name) ================


PLoP 96 FINAL SUBMISSION EVALUATION 


      Title: ____________________________________________________________

  Author(s): ____________________________________________________________


I. CONTENT

 1. Describe the field of the paper (e.g., concurrent programming,
    software process and organization, software architecture).










 2. Does the paper focus mainly on patterns or on discussions about
    patterns or experience with patterns?










 2. Summarize the paper as concisely as you can.










 3. Is the paper technically sound?  (Circle or underline a number on 
 				      the scale below.) 

                sound  1    2    3    4    5  unsound
    

 4. How confident are you in your assessment of the technical
    correctness of this paper?

                confident  1    2    3    4    5  not confident

 5. Do the authors make adequate reference to related patterns and/or
    work in the field?

             adequate  1    2    3    4    5  inadequate

    If the references are not adequate, briefly list other references
    they should cite:








 6. Has the author convinced you that the pattern(s) is/are valid?

            convinced  1    2    3    4    5  unconvinced
    

II. PRESENTATION

 1. Is the paper well-organized?

       well-organized  1    2    3    4    5  disorganized
    

 2. Is the presentation clear?

                clear  1    2    3    4    5  unclear
    

 3. Is the English satisfactory?

         satisfactory  1    2    3    4    5  unsatisfactory
    

 4. Does the paper contain excess material?  If so, what?










 5. Does the paper lack necessary material?  If so, what?

 








 6. Are more or fewer figures necessary?  If so, explain the changes.











III. RECOMMENDATIONS

 __ accept as is

 __ accept with minor revisions as noted in Section IV.   

 __ reject

 __ reject for PLoPD but submit to: __________________________________________


IV. COMMENTS

Please elaborate on your evaluation and recommendations.  Include
comments on importance, originality, and style.  Comments are crucial
to the editors' decision-making process and are strongly encouraged
whether you recommend acceptance or rejection.